**This post is dedicated to those who lost their lives in the tragic massacre in Connecticut. All information below is typed and published in honor of the children and teachers killed in this horrible event.**
The new models have come in for a December 20-23 potential significant winter storm. Let's get into it.
We start with the European weather service's ECMWF model. This is a forecast for December 19th, and we see two things happening here: a pair of storm systems in New England, as well as a low pressure system beginning to emerge from the Rocky Mountains. Our system is that one emerging from the Rockies, with a central pressure of 993 millibars, meaning it is a fairly strong storm. Let's hone in on the atmospheric set up at this point. We see that dual storm system departing, as well as a weak high pressure system in the Southeast. A high pressure system is also shown in the West US. Not really anything significant to note at this time other than a progressive negative PNA pattern showing up, something likely to change as this system moves east.
24 hours later, we see our system has now moved into the Midwest, pushed in that direction by the Southeast ridge being shown to the east of Florida. We now see a high pressure system in the West US and the Rockies. Note the compact-ness of the low pressure system in the Midwest- that means our system is small but strong, as the central minimum pressure is at 996 millibars. Now, I don't trust the ECMWF path at the moment, and I'll tell you why. The pattern that was ongoing when this system emerged from the Rockies was a negative PNA, meaning that the system goes into the Plains or into the Deep South. Now, the system emerged from the Rockies, and we see the ECMWF project it moving into the Midwest as seeing the image above. As this system moves into this region, it's likely we will see a positive PNA set up, something I will discuss later on.
Now, on the morning of December 22nd, we see our system has shifted into the Northeast, with a minimum pressure nearing 980 millibars. Check out that incredible pressure gradient in the Midwest. The closer those lines (isobars) are together, the stronger the surface winds will be. If that's any indication of what we could see, December 22nd could be a very windy day if the ECMWF pans out.
Here's what I think will be crucial in determining if the ECMWF will work. As I said above, the system will leave the Rockies in the midst of a brief PNA phase change, from negative to positive. Above is the ECMWF's 500mb height anomaly forecast for the morning of December 21st (Oddly enough, the day the world is predicted to end). We can see the storm system in the Ohio Valley, but take a closer look at the ridge in the Rockies. That is a positive PNA, people! Such a positive PNA, combined with the presence of a Southeast ridge presents us with the general idea that a Midwest/Ohio Valley hit is "likely", but only if the pattern works out as the ECMWF is predicting it to.
Before we move on to the GFS model, the ECMWF did show some snowfall in the WI/MI regions from this system, on the order of several inches at most.
This is the American weather service's GFS model, a forecasting model that is always in a tight race with the ECMWF to see which is better. Historically, the ECMWF has a better forecasting record, but the GFS has been catching up recently. Above, we see the December 19th afternoon forecast of sea level pressure (SLP) anomalies. The cool colors show lowered pressures (indicative of a storm system), and warmer colors show raised pressures, which typically show a quieter pattern. This forecast from the GFS shows our storm system in the Midwest at this time. Our Southeast ridge is present, meaning the East Coast isn't so likely to see this storm. Note the timing differences between the GFS and ECMWF for when the storm system moves into the Plains- this GFS forecast is for the afternoon of Dec. 19, and the ECMWF is for the morning of December 20th. As small as 12 hours' difference may seem, I can tell you firsthand that such a difference can bring about severe track changes.
Moving into the early morning of December 21st, we see the storm system has now entered the East Great Lakes with a minimum pressure 993 millibars. Also note the storm system in the Southeast that is likely to swing up the coast. As this storm system moves into the Great Lakes, if the GFS verifies, we could see a nasty cold outbreak across the Plains, Midwest, Great Lakes and Ohio Valley if cold air is indeed available. That's not a guarantee, but something could come out of this.
Here's the thing that really shocks me, but not in the way you think. On the morning of December 22nd, we see our storm system has now bombed out to 971 millibars- a very strong storm system for an on-land system. This is what shocks me: the nature that this storm system takes. We see it move into the Northeast, but suddenly stop moving and retrograde (move west in the North Hemisphere) slightly, essentially staying put. If such an event happened, we could see significant cold and snow across the northeastern quadrant (not specifically limited to the Northeast- imagine cutting the nation into 4 pieces) of the United States.
Total accumulated snow from the GFS through the morning of Dec. 22 shows who could get slammed:
Forecast Preference: ECMWF
Confidence: 30%
Andrew
4 comments:
Well Andrew so far in my weather experiences, I've learned many things, but their is one which is very important. Never rely on models UNTIL about 2-3 days away. Thank you for putting it out there though that a storm could bring damage. Now I live in northern NJ so what are the chances of that storm hitting my area? Also if it does spin up to the great lakes, will a secondary storm form and strengthen off the east coast? Thanks Andrew!
It's going to affect the upper Midwest, including the Chicago area potentially. Northwest Indiana, (Lake, Porter, LaPorte counties are look at a big lake-effect event Friday into Saturday.
If the ECWMF model is correct that could mean a good snowstorm for Denver Colorado?
I havent seen a snowstorm in years. i forgot what it was like
Post a Comment