In the wake of Superstorm Sandy, a system that destroyed homes, business and lives, some are speaking up about how this occurred in response to climate change. But was that REALLY the reason why this happened?
NO. And here's why.
Sandy was a low-end hurricane.
If those who are proclaiming global warming's presence in this system really believed it, you would see a major hurricane, not a modest Category 2 hurricane, like Sandy was. Now, could such extreme events happen thanks to a system as weak as a tropical storm? Absolutely. But those in favor of climate change factoring into Sandy are treating it like a once-in-a-lifetime event (It was), but like a super-hurricane rather than a convenient merging of two storms, described below.
What Sandy did happens DOZENS of times a year.
The way Sandy got so strong was by phasing, or two or more storms combining in to one storm system. This phasing enabled two bodies of energy to come together, and the presence of the Atlantic Ocean only fueled the fire. But the truth is that phasing of storms happens on a very regular basis. This just happened to be a right place, right time moment for a hurricane and a strong Canadian system.
This storm was not as powerful as some believe.
Don't get me wrong when you see this title, Sandy was a VERY strong storm system. However, many are overestimating the strength of Sandy. The only reason this system had such a big impact was because it struck the nation's economic and political homeland. Think about it. If Superstorm Sandy had hit, say, a desolate area in any nation, would you still think it was as powerful? Again, this storm was very strong, but the human and cultural effects are making many overestimate this event.
Global warming takes time.
Let's say that Sandy was a result of global warming/climate change. If that were the case, then every coastal storm following a path similar to Sandy's track should have been much stronger. Global warming is not a 'drive-by event' (the event shows itself briefly, i.e. a single earthquake), it takes immense time. Believe me, if global warming had taken control of Earth, the derecho in the Mid-Atlantic this past summer would have mowed down entire cities. Every severe thunderstorm event this past summer would have likely had extreme bouts of wind, hail, rain and tornadoes. But did that happen? No.
Superstorm Sandy was indeed a horrible storm, one that will not be easily forgotten in coming decades. However, global warming does not appear to be the culprit for such an event.
Andrew
NO. And here's why.
Sandy was a low-end hurricane.
If those who are proclaiming global warming's presence in this system really believed it, you would see a major hurricane, not a modest Category 2 hurricane, like Sandy was. Now, could such extreme events happen thanks to a system as weak as a tropical storm? Absolutely. But those in favor of climate change factoring into Sandy are treating it like a once-in-a-lifetime event (It was), but like a super-hurricane rather than a convenient merging of two storms, described below.
What Sandy did happens DOZENS of times a year.
The way Sandy got so strong was by phasing, or two or more storms combining in to one storm system. This phasing enabled two bodies of energy to come together, and the presence of the Atlantic Ocean only fueled the fire. But the truth is that phasing of storms happens on a very regular basis. This just happened to be a right place, right time moment for a hurricane and a strong Canadian system.
This storm was not as powerful as some believe.
Don't get me wrong when you see this title, Sandy was a VERY strong storm system. However, many are overestimating the strength of Sandy. The only reason this system had such a big impact was because it struck the nation's economic and political homeland. Think about it. If Superstorm Sandy had hit, say, a desolate area in any nation, would you still think it was as powerful? Again, this storm was very strong, but the human and cultural effects are making many overestimate this event.
Global warming takes time.
Let's say that Sandy was a result of global warming/climate change. If that were the case, then every coastal storm following a path similar to Sandy's track should have been much stronger. Global warming is not a 'drive-by event' (the event shows itself briefly, i.e. a single earthquake), it takes immense time. Believe me, if global warming had taken control of Earth, the derecho in the Mid-Atlantic this past summer would have mowed down entire cities. Every severe thunderstorm event this past summer would have likely had extreme bouts of wind, hail, rain and tornadoes. But did that happen? No.
Superstorm Sandy was indeed a horrible storm, one that will not be easily forgotten in coming decades. However, global warming does not appear to be the culprit for such an event.
Andrew