Sunday, April 20, 2014

Spring, Summerlike Warmth Expected in Late April, May

I'm expecting the end of April and beginning of May to have seasonal to above-normal warmth across much of the country.

Tropical Tidbits
Shown above is the 500mb height anomaly pressure forecast over the West Pacific for April 26th. In this image, we see a strong ridge of high pressure stationed over Japan and East Asia, permitting the flow of above normal temperatures into the area. This event has significant implications on our weather here in the US. There is a rule, well explained by Joe Renken, that states a weather phenomenon in East Asia will be reciprocated in the United States 6-10 days later. This means that if there is a storm system in Japan on a certain day, we can expect a storm in the US 6-10 days after that. The same goes for high pressure and warm weather. So, if we use that rule, we can expect warmth over the United States around the May 1-5 period, if not for a longer time period than that.

The factors for warmth don't stop there- it goes far deeper, literally and metaphorically.


The image above may look complicated, but isn't that complex when explained thoroughly. Shown above is a graphical representation of a phenomenon called the Walker Circulation, also known as the Walker Cell. The Walker Circulation is most prominent in a La Nina situation, and forms when you have cool waters towards the Eastern Pacific, and warm waters near Oceania and Australia. The trade winds across the Pacific go from east to west in the Walker Circulation on the surface, due to the presence of high pressure in the East Pacific and low pressure in the West Pacific (think of it like a ball rolling downhill from the top of the hill (high pressure in the east Pacific) to the bottom of the hill (low pressure in the West Pacific), where the ball signifies the trade winds). When the trade winds reach the low pressure area in the western Pacific, the winds converge and begin pushing up into the atmosphere, creating thunderstorms. The air from the thunderstorms shoots up to roughly the 250mb to 200mb level before the winds spread out, as the air cannot rise further. From there, the air at 200mb flows from west-to-east, opposite the direction of the surface winds. Then, the high pressure and cool/dry atmosphere in the East Pacific pulls that air down back to the surface to start the whole process over again. As I said, this typically appears in La Nina situations, as cool waters in the East Pacific that are required for the Walker Circulation typically arise in conjunction with the La Nina.

The image above shows a view of surface pressure and surface wind vectors across the tropical regions of the world. We can use this image to identify the presence, or lack thereof, of the Walker Circulation. Taking a glance at surface pressures and winds from April 6th to April 10th, we do see surface winds flowing from east-to-west, a trait typically observed with the Walker Cell, and the low pressure center in Oceania also shows a characteristic of that circulation. This is rather odd, as we have been expecting an El Nino to arise, but the Walker Cell appearance here tells me that the El Nino has not hit the atmosphere yet, though it may start appearing in the surface temperatures. In recent days, the surface winds have been showing signs of weakening, indicating that the Walker Circulation may be weakening, which would herald the arrival of an El Nino if the winds reverse to a west-to-east stature.


For all intents and purposes, let's say that the Walker Cell's presence in the Pacific still indicates the presence of a La Nina (which is true in respect to the Walker Cell actually appearing, even though sea surface temperatures may argue otherwise). We can correlate sea surface temperatures in the Pacific to surface temperatures here in the United States. In the image above, the warm colors indicate a positive correlation of SSTs to surface temperatures (for example, warm Pacific SSTs would then correlate to warm temperatures in the US, or cool Pacific SSTs would lead to cool temperatures in the US). Blues in the above image then depict a negative correlation, where warm Pacific SSTs would lead to cool surface temperatures, and vice versa. In this case, with negative correlation signals across the US above, we can determine that below normal SSTs in the Pacific (La Nina) can then lead to above normal surface temperatures in the US, and vice versa. Thus, even though the SSTs in the Pacific indicate an El Nino, the atmospheric pattern is more supportive of a La Nina, which would then support warmer than normal conditions in the April-May-June timeframe. Despite this, since the Walker Circulation may be fading, this portion may just be a moot point in just a few weeks time.

This image here actually is pretty complicated, but I'll do my best to explain it. This graphic shows the layout of the Global Wind Oscillation (GWO), and what factors indicate the presence of the GWO in one of a possible eight phases. For example, if the GWO is to be in Phase 1, we would look out for negative mountain torque (MT) values, as well as enhanced tropical convection in the Indian Ocean. An additional description of the GWO comes from the ESRL, as shown in the screenshot below.


I outlined the Stage 1 description, as not only does it fit in with the current conditions that we're experiencing, but it is indicative of a La Nina, like we talked about earlier in this post. How do we know for sure that we're in the Phases 1-3 of the GWO (which are traditionally La Nina-esque phases)? Let's take a look at the indicators that depict Phases 1 through 3 of the GWO.

Observed Mountain Torque

Observed Relative AAM
If we look at the first GWO image we discussed, as well as the screenshot description of the GWO, we can see what defines these key phases. We see that negative mountain torque and convection in the Indian Ocean is a key definition of these first three GWO phases. Looking at that observed MT chart shown above, we see that the net MT is now below average, as the black solid line shows. While the convection in the Pacific is more displaced in Oceania instead of the Indian Ocean, the description highlights that the relative AAM is negative, and that relative AAM image above shows a negative anomaly. Overall, this does indicate the La Nina phases, also known as GWO phases 1-3, strengthening that correlation image, as well as the Walker Circulation discussion. Additionally, in the same sense that positive East Asian mountain torque can lead to cooler than normal temperatures in the US, the current negative East Asian mountain torque anomaly in the graphic above (red line two images above) indicates warm weather is more likely.

Importantly, in that screenshot description image, we see that the La Nina-like stages indicate a trough in the Western US. Typically, when we see a trough/stormy weather in the West US, we get a consequential ridge of high pressure in the East US, which is a textbook negative PNA pattern.

The image above shows observed sunspots in accordance with the 30-day sunspot cycle. As I've mentioned on this blog before, there is a known inverse correlation between the 30-day sunspot cycle and the Pacific-North American index (PNA). When the 30 day sunspot number is anomalously high, we tend to see the PNA in its negative phase. In the same sense, when the 30 day sunspot number is anomalously low, the PNA tends to reside more in its positive phase. Composite images of both the positive PNA and negative PNA are shown above, courtesy of NCSU.

500mb height anomalies of a negative PNA on the left (warm colors= high pressure, cool colors = low pressure)
Surface temperature anomalies of a negative PNA on the right

500mb height anomalies of a positive PNA on the left
Surface temperature anomalies of a positive PNA on the right
If we look back at the sunspot image, we see that the 30 day sunspot cycle is just off the charts, indicating a very high number of sunspots, or at the very least, elevated solar activity. If we use our solar correlation with the PNA, we may be expecting the emergence of a negative PNA regime in the near future. If we look at the composite image above for a negative PNA, we see that warm weather tends to prevail in that sort of situation. This fits in well with the GWO description we went over earlier, the presence of the La Nina Walker Circulation, and the East Asian correlation tool.

The last piece to the puzzle is the presence of enhanced tropical convection over Oceania.


The image above gives a global view of rising air in conjunction with enhanced tropical convection (blue shading), also known as negative Outgoing Longwave Radiation (OLR), as well as sinking air, exemplified by the beige shadings, which show suppressed tropical convection. The green contours highlight divergence, or air rising and spreading out due to thunderstorms, while red contours depict sinking of air. We see that there is an anomalous swath of tropical convection over Oceania, shown by the blues/tropical convection, and the wind vectors at 200mb going away from that convection. The placement of this tropical convection fits into a certain phase of the Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO).

If we consider that the current center of the tropical convection is around the 165 East longitude line or 170 East line, we can see which MJO phase is best represented here. It looks like the MJO is currently in Phase 6 or 7, as the line on the 165 East shows splitting through the two panels on the right that are circled.

What does a Phase 6 MJO mean in the month of April?

The Phase 6 MJO looks like a typical negative PNA regime, with low pressure anomalies along the West Coast, and strong high pressure/warm weather in the Central and East US. This supports the overall warm weather idea, only adding to the rest of the factors supporting a warm weather regime in the late April and early May timeframes.

Let's summarize all of this.

• Based on a number of factors, warmer than normal weather is expected for the latter part of April, potentially well into the beginning of May.

Andrew

Saturday, April 19, 2014

April 23rd Potential Severe Weather Event


The Storm Prediction Center has outlined an area of enhanced severe weather potential on April 23rd, as the severe weather season finally begins to show signs of activity.

The SPC is discussing the presence of a corridor of instability aligned just east of a dryline set up along the western Central Plains, and it is this corridor of instability that is outlined in the graphic above. In these dryline situations, it is not uncommon to see isolated storm cells fire up, which then enhance the likelihood of tornadoes and overall elevated severe weather. If enough individualized storm cells form, the cells can congeal into a nasty squall line, or may just remain as individualized cells, which would maintain a raised tornado threat.


Model guidance shows this narrow section of instability, as the GFS model graphic above shows. However, under the roughly-15000 j/kg of instability (indicating the atmosphere is decently unstable), we see a hatched gray area. This indicates the presence of a capping inversion, which just means there is warm air above the surface that is hindering the development of thunderstorms. An analysis of a sounding chart confirms a layer of warm air in the first few thousand feet above the surface. The concern here is that this capping inversion may prevent storms from forming at all, which could just wipe out the severe threat. In this case, there is a severe weather threat if storms form; the question is just if these storms will form.

Andrew

Friday, April 18, 2014

Long Range Forecast for Late April, Early May

Let's examine the long range forecast for late April into the beginning days of May.

Long range analog guidance from the ESRL/PSD division, a special physics-based meteorology branch of the government weather service, indicates we will see troughing setting up in Western North America in late April as a strong upper level low drops into the Southwest, provoking high pressure out ahead of it in the Central and East US. This ridge out ahead of the upper level low will likely make for anomalously warm weather across the aforementioned sections of the country, a real treat in the face of such a nasty winter.

Beyond the last days of April, it is expected that the weather will take on a slightly cooler tone. In the wake of a Kelvin Wave currently pushing across the Pacific, enhanced tropical convection is expected to develop near the 60E Longitude demarcation, a classic Phase 1 MJO signal. When we see enhanced tropical convection in this Phase 1 signal, it typically means we can anticipate cooler than normal weather here in the United States.

I am a bit skeptical of this cold weather forecast, due to the response we're looking to see in East Asia around April 26th. There is a rule, well explained by Joe Renken, that states a weather phenomenon in East Asia will be reciprocated in the United States 6-10 days later. This means that if there is a storm system in Japan on a certain day, we can expect a storm in the US 6-10 days after that. The same goes for high pressure and warm weather. In this image above, we see projected tropopause pressures, vector winds, and wind speeds way up in the middle-upper regions of the troposphere into the stratosphere. If we look to this forecast image, valid April 26th, and find Japan in the top left corner of the image, we can make out a bulge of orange pushing towards the center of this image. That orange bulge signifies the presence of a Rossby Wave. In simple terms, this Rossby Wave will 'break' over Japan and initiate an intensive warming spell. This may continue for some time, but if it does happen in late April, we would likely see the cooling effects of the Phase 1 MJO hurt, as this East Asian development would likely overrule it.

To summarize:
• A warm end to April is expected.
• A cool start to May is possible, but there are hints that the late April warmth may just carry over into May. More time is needed to investigate this potential.
• A severe weather event is possible in the final 7 days of April, due to the upper level low in the West US.

Andrew

Thursday, April 17, 2014

2014-2015 Winter Preliminary Analysis of ENSO

We're going to take a look at the forecast for the El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO) phenomenon for the Winter of 2014-2015 in today's post.

The image above shows a composite of multiple global modeling systems, and their projections for water temperature anomalies in the eastern Pacific. In this forecast, we see the heavy majority of the pictured models preferring to rapidly warm the East Pacific over the summer, as we see the general linear trend from neutral-ENSO temperatures (anomalies nonexistent, near zero) to a moderate El Nino (anomalies of +1C to +1.5C) from now until August. Beyond that point, the model guidance and ensemble members begin to diverge and lose their consensus, but there does appear to be quite a bit of room for a strong El Nino (+1.5C or higher water temperature anomalies) to form later on in the fall.

So, with an El Nino expected heading into the fall, what if it continues on into next winter?

If we look at the image above, we can get a good idea of what temperature anomalies may be like for the upcoming winter due to the El Nino. This image shows you the probability of extreme warm or cold winters during El Nino years. As the image shows, the North US experiences a higher chance of an extreme warmth winter, while the South sees their risk for an extreme cold winter rise. Thus, we can anticipate that the North might see a warmer than normal winter this year and in to 2015. However, that will be looked at again later this year.

If we check out a similar graphic for precipitation anomalies, we get a feel-good story. The West US, currently suffering through one of the worst (if not the worst) droughts on record, typically experiences a wetter than normal winter during El Nino winters. The winters near Montana are typically a bit drier than normal when in an El Nino state, and this is also found along the Ohio Valley. The Plains and East Coast then tend to see wetter than normal winters. This spells good news for not only winter weather fans in the East, but those hurt by the drought in the West.

Let's summarize this.
• Model guidance is strongly leaning towards an El Nino event this winter.
• During El Nino winters, the North US is typically warmer than normal, while the South is cooler than normal.
• During El Nino winters, the East Coast, Plains and Rockies are typically wetter than normal, while the North Plains and Ohio Valley are drier than normal.
• Many more factors affect seasonal outlooks than just the El Nino Southern Oscillation phenomenon- this does not constitute a winter forecast.

Andrew

Monday, April 14, 2014

April 16-17 Potentially Significant Snowstorm

I'm monitoring the potential for a significant snowstorm on April 16-17.

We begin by looking at the GFS model. The GFS model shows a strong storm system dropping down from Canada, taking advantage of the cold air already displaced south in the United States and producing an intense snowstorm in the Upper Midwest. The GFS indicates we may see amounts over 12 inches across northern Wisconsin and upper peninsula of Michigan, with spotty amounts nearing or exceeding 18 inches possible. Given model guidance tendencies to be too snowy/too cold in their forecasts, as well as the fact that models may be overdoing snow because they're stuck in a wintry pattern when we're really transitioning to spring (though the snow falling out my window begs to differ), I'm skeptical of these 18 inch-plus amounts. However, if the storm is as strong as projected, a big snowstorm would be expected. I'm just skeptical of temperature profiles right now.

The NAM model, a short-range, higher-resolution sibling of the GFS model, is actually showing similar amounts. I'm expressing surprise here because the NAM is notorious for over-doing snowfall guidance, in that it can (and frequently does) forecast more snow to fall than what actually does fall. However, comparing the GFS and NAM models, they are pretty similar. While this raises confidence in this outlook, it's nothing to get too excited about. I'm still very skeptical of this event, and I want to emphasize how this has a high 'bust potential' (meaning the forecast has the potential to 'bust', or fail). However, if the forecast ends up to be on target, then I am on board for a big snowstorm. With spring, model guidance starts to struggle due to the pattern changing, and that messes up model guidance. This could be a flash in the pan, or something more.

Shown below is a hand-drawn image of amounts as depicted by the GFS and NAM, for easier interpretation.


To summarize:
• There is the potential for a significant snowstorm in the Upper Midwest on April 16-17.
• Amounts may exceed 12 inches in many places.
• I am skeptical of this forecast, as model guidance may be too cold and may be forecasting too much snow to fall.

Andrew