Thursday, July 25, 2013

Positive QBO May Not Survive into Winter

The positive QBO we have seen evolve in the past few months appears unlikely to survive into this winter.

The graph above shows the evolution of the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO) over the past few years, up until the present day. The QBO involves a wind pattern in the stratosphere- in positive QBO winters, the polar vortex is strengthened, and opportunities for cold weather in North America are lowered. In a negative QBO, the wind pattern opposes the polar vortex, leading to additional chances for colder weather. We see more bouts of negative pulses than positive ones on this graph, and the positive QBO waves that do come about are not nearly as strong as the negative pulses. Looking to the far right side of the image, we see a new positive QBO pulse has evolved in recent months. Looking at the far, far right part of the image, we see that the positive QBO has been weakening recently. Could this be a sign that the +QBO pulse is weakening? Will it survive the winter? The first question is a yes (at the moment), while the second question could be a no.

I managed to string together several other atmospheric factors that can help determine the future of this +QBO wave. The first one involves a rather complicated pattern known as the AAM.

This image shows the observed AAM values from August 2012 to the present day. If you look closely, you can see that the AAM trend matches up with the QBO trend. We see negative AAM values from August to roughly November; a quick look at the QBO chart shows negative values were present at that time. Towards the winter months of 2012-2013, we see a definitive positive trend in the AAM, and this occurs around the time the QBO begins its ascent to neutral, and eventually positive territory. Now, with two big negative dips in June and July on the AAM chart, we are starting to see the QBO decrease. Is this correlation a coincidence, or an actual correlation between the two? It's an actual correlation- There is a positive correlation on the order of 0.391 between the AAM and QBO. This means that whatever the AAM does, the QBO tends to do as well, as we showed in this analysis of the two charts. The QBO's trends are also reflected onto the AAM. A value of 0.391 is pretty substantial, compared to other correlations I have seen in different atmospheric patterns, so this should be closely watched.

There's an even more significant correlation that is aiding in the positive QBO dwindling down, and the atmospheric pattern causing this new correlation is the Southern Oscillation Index, or SOI.

This screenshot displays the average SOI values over the past 30 and 90 days- the third box is something we will not discuss here. In the last 30 days, the SOI has averaged out to 8.9, and the last 90 days have brought the SOI to a 7.6 value. A look at any possible correlation between the SOI and QBO reveals a significant negative correlation of -0.521. This negative correlation means that whatever the SOI does, the QBO tends to do the opposite- in this case, the presence of positive SOI anomalies could very well be helping along the weakening of this positive QBO pulse. As I said in the previous correlation, 0.391 is a pretty noticeable correlation; -0.521 is an even bigger correlation, and one that, in my opinion, ought to be driving this fading +QBO pulse. If we want to see the +QBO weaken (which would be good for cold prospects (a negative QBO would be great for cold weather)), I would want to see the positive SOI strengthen to double digits for a prolonged period of time- that would seriously hurt the +QBO pulse.

Our last correlation is not nearly as significant as the previous two, but is another factor assisting in the weakening of the current +QBO phase.

This screenshot shows sea surface temperatures (SST's) in the Nino 1+2 region from now all the way back to August 2012. If you recall, the Nino 1+2 region is located in the waters immediately offshore of western Ecuador. Recently, we have seen very strong below normal SST anomalies in this region, and I decided to see if there was a match between the Nino 1+2 temperatures and the QBO phase. There is a positive correlation of 0.144 between the two. Again, it is not nearly as significant as the other two. However, as the Nino 1+2 region has been so anomalously below normal recently, there must be at least a slight helping by this factor to help weaken the +QBO.

If you're interested, there is a correlation two times stronger than the Nino 1+2/QBO correlation between the Nino 1+2 and AAM. The correlation is a positive one, coming in at 0.282. If the Nino 1+2 region remains negative, it means the AAM will tend to go negative, and that means the QBO will tend to go negative. Likewise, if the AAM goes negative, the Nino 1+2 region's sea surface temperatures will also tend to stay in negative territory.

If these correlations work out, the AAM continues to go negative and the SOI strengthens in its positive phase, the chances of the QBO at least weakening further are rather high.



Anonymous said...

Man, CFS model, QBO,PDO,NAO,ENSO and analogs all lining up? Dont want to get my hopes up too early, but it may look like the stars are aligning.

Still 4 more months to go though

Anonymous said...

Does this mean cold or warm?

Anonymous said...

I am having a hard time understanding this! I need it simplified...I just don't understand the terms used at all.
I just need laymen terms as this is way above my head!
Thank you though for letting us know, but is there anyway you can simplify it for people like me? Thank you,

Andrew said...

Bree: This whole post was a pretty tough one to compose, so I guess it's no surprise some people are having trouble understanding it. No worries, I will make sure to try and better compose future posts.

Anonymous said...

That was awesome to read. Thank you!