Saturday, December 14, 2013

December 19-23 Probable Significant Winter Storm

I would not be surprised to see a strong storm system traversing the nation over the December 19-23 period. We'll start off this analysis with a portion of the post from December 11.

A pretty strong storm system is expected to move across Japan in 48 hours, after dumping multiple storm systems over that area in the past few days. This storm system is looking healthy, as defined by the GFS ensemble mid-level height anomaly forecast above over Japan. As I have mentioned on this blog, there is a 6-10 day correlation between weather that occurs in East Asia, and weather that occurs in the United States. Thus, with this forecast image, we arrive at the December 13th date. Go ahead 6-10 days, and we find the potential storm timeframe of December 19th to 23rd. The reason I believe it may be significant is due to the strength of this system on the image above. Unlike the upcoming weekend storm, which saw only a moderate system in East Asia 6-10 days prior, the current East Asian projection is for a strong storm to hit Japan, and long range model guidance senses that this system will also be a strong one for the US. (End December 11 post).


The teleconnection forecast for the next little while from the Earth System Research Laboratory (ESRL) above shows projections for the Pacific-North American index (PNA), the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), the West Pacific Oscillation (WPO), and the East Pacific Oscillation (EPO). For this discussion, we will focus on the PNA and the NAO.

The forecast for the Pacific North American index is negative over the time period for this storm system, even bottoming out to its minimum during when I anticipate this storm system to strike. So what does the atmosphere look like during a negative PNA?



The image above is what is referred to as a negative Pacific-North American index phase (or -PNA for short). The negative PNA results from ridging in the Gulf of Alaska that then produces storminess/troughiness in the Western US. In response to that West US storminess, we then see the development of high pressure in the Southeast. The jet stream in this situation takes storms from the West and runs them north and east, typically delivering snow to the same areas that have been getting snow recently (think Plains, Midwest, Great Lakes regions). An interesting point of interest is how the two arrows on the image above (from NCSU) merge in the Plains. That means that, if the timing is just right, two storm systems could combine (phase) and form a stronger, single storm. History suggests storms that encounter phasing do become anomalously stronger thereafter, and can produce significant wintry precipitation. I'm not implying this will be a phasing situation, just something interesting.

The next item to discuss is the projected positive phase of the North Atlantic Oscillation. During the positive NAO, we see stormy weather over Greenland, which shifts the jet stream so the weather pattern is not conducive to those big high pressure systems you might sometimes see over the Bering Sea or even the Western US. The positive NAO pattern is what is called 'progressive', meaning no atmospheric feature really sticks around in any single area, because the atmosphere wants to keep this moving, so to speak. That said, previous forecasts for this storm had the system going north-northeast from the southern Plains into the Dakotas and Upper Midwest. Because of that progressive pattern, I'm really doubting we see such a spike northward. Will we see northward movement? Yes, because the -PNA will supply that ridging in the Southeast. However, the progressive nature of the positive NAO should limit any NNE or even due-north movement by this storm. I would watch out for the storm to move northeast, or even ENE.

This relative measure of predictability map, from the NCEP, gives us a glimpse at what atmospheric conditions are likely to be unfolding by an assortment of colors, defined in likelihood by the legend at the bottom. In this case, we see that blues have a single or low double-digit percent chance of verifying, while oranges define close to a 65% or better chance of verification. This map is valid on the evening of December 20th, roughly a day or two before this storm is projected to strike. There are three things we have to look at with this graphic.

The first item we'll discuss in this image is the ridging over the southern portion of the Gulf of Alaska. This ridging is encased in solid oranges right over the heart of the big arcing in the waters west of California and the coast, signaling high confidence that this ridge will be present. If that ridge is present, then is essentially guarantees the set-up I described above. Why? Well, that ridge in the waters off the West Coast then creates West US troughing, which provokes high pressure in the Southeast, and suddenly we have a classic negative PNA pattern.

Second, we see a swath of oranges extending from southern Canada into the Rockies. The troughing in the West from that negative PNA pattern tells us that the ensembles are sensing the trough to be our storm system in the December 19-23 timeframe. Like the Gulf of Alaska ridge, the oranges signify over a 60% confidence among the ensemble system with this storm system. Rising confidence among the ensembles for not only the storm itself, but for the NE Pacific ridge tells me that this storm is becoming even more likely.

Third, there is a wide body of oranges in the Southeast US. Going back to that negative PNA pattern, high pressure/ridging in the Southeast is expected, so it really isn't surprising that the ensemble set is going with a >60% chance of that ridge occurring. However, with the aforementioned progressive pattern thanks to the +NAO, it is unlikely that we see this ridge take over the East entirely.

Model forecasts aren't as consistent as I'd like them to be, but here's what the GEM and ECMWF models show for this timeframe. I picked them, because they seem to be following the progressive pattern, and do respect the Southeast ridge that is likely to be present in this timeframe.


The timing is a little off, though that could be attributed to the ECMWF tendency to keep energy in the Southwest a little too long, and the fact that we're still some time out from this event actually occurring. Nonetheless, other forecasts have the storm pushing more to the Southeast, and I'm really not so sure we'll see that happen. It would appear that the storm currently ongoing from the Midwest to the Northeast might be similar to this upcoming storm, as teleconnections will be nearly the same what they are now. Additionally, the negative PNA will be even stronger, and this would mean a more persistent Southeast ridge that would keep away any southern suppression of this upcoming storm system.

It's to be determined exactly where the storm will go, but you can kind of get an idea of my early thoughts from this post. I do expect this storm to be strong, and it will most likely have a wintry side with accumulating snowfall. The intensity is TBD, but confidence in the storm itself and the set-up surrounding the storm is rather high.

Andrew

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

Good blog Andrew! Found to be very informative. What do you think of this storm hitting N.E. Iowa, S.W. Wisconsin?

Anonymous said...

Hello,
I have been looking at the GFS model from the NOAA website. It shows mostly rain here in central Indiana until the back of the storm. Do you think we could see snow for a white Christmas?
Thank you,
Ian

Shawn said...

I think we got between 1 to 2 inches of snow with the storm from yesterday. I am hoping this upcoming storm produces very heavy snow amounts! I live in central/east central Missouri. :)

Anonymous said...

Do you think there will be any chance of severe weather for the south/southeast from this storm?

matt zuro said...

Hey Andrew,
I have been watching the website to see of any other details on this storm would come out. I live in Chicago and on the other forecast it said we could get a lot of snow. I would like to know of this is the same with this run.

Thanks!

Anonymous said...

How are the Colorado Rockies looking on this upcoming event? Because I have noticed that the models have continuously been back and forth on the strength of the storm, the GFS is bringing a weaker storm, producing minor accumulations at best, what is your opinion on the overall strength of the storm once it is over the Rockies?

Anonymous said...

is this the christmas storm that i have heard and read alot about. just last nite there was talk of a storm pulling out of the southwest across kansas then heads to the lakes dropping from ONE TO TWO FEET OF SNOW. whats your opinion of this?? anybody??

Andrew said...

Anonymous at 4:12: It is possible.

Ian: Hard to tell until the models get settled.

Anonymous at 4:43: I haven't analyzed the severe weather aspect yet.

Matt: Chicago remains in line for this potential storm.

Anonymous at 5:11: A recent forecast does not bring any significant snow to Denver at this time.

Anonymous at 6:16: It's too early to think about amounts.

Owen12789 said...

What about central illinois Springfield especially. If I am reading the models correctly it looks like we could be in for some hefty amounts of snow. Could you please elaborate a little more for me please a second? Thank you!!

matt zuro said...

Thanks Andrew! My question is will we get a little ammount of snowfall or would we still see a lot af snow. Because on the last post it said we were supposed to get a reasonable ammount

tim20tonys said...

guys i want to tell all of you that i look at all of the forecast in northeast illinois and they are saying that we are going to get rain and snow for northeast illinois and with temps in upper 30's and lower 40's and we might get a mix in northeast illinois.