Wednesday, December 18, 2013

December 19-22 Significant Snowstorm & Ice Storm Update

This post will address the current situation of the model guidance, as well as what I think will be happening.

The ECMWF model, which previously dumped a wide plethora of snow in excess of one foot across the Lower Great Lakes, suddenly flipped over to the GFS' solution in an unexpected turn of events. The European model had been forecasting this solution for five consecutive runs until this afternoon, when it decided to take the snows further north in accordance with shifting the low pressure system itself further north. The GFS and GGEM had also taken this system further north with today's afternoon runs, meaning a consensus appears to be forming.

I have a few thoughts on this. For one, with a storm this strong, a northern shift to the storm was bound to occur, though one could argue it was made a while ago when the GFS came north after making its far-south forecast a few days ago. Strong storms naturally have the tendency to overachieve to the north, so to say, in that models may underestimate the northward motion of the storm. I find that to be a very plausible scenario, and it is possible this ends up being the final track to the storm.

Another possibility with this system is that it is not being handled correctly. This would arise due to the lack of this system being in the United States, where the radiosonde (instruments attached to the big weather balloons) can collect crucial data that then goes into the models, and enhances their forecast's credibility. Our system is not in the US yet- it is currently skirting the west coast of Canada. It is possible that the track will change again over the next 24-48 hours before it finally comes ashore. When it does come ashore, expect to see a model consensus quickly materialize, whether it be the one depicted above by the ECMWF, or a further south one.

One thing is for sure, however- this storm will be hauling loads of moisture northward. As the relative humidity forecast chart from the GFS shows, there will be immense amounts of moisture being pulled north for this storm. Regardless of where the storm ends up tracking, chances are good that someone will receive significant snow, while others receive a significant ice storm, and still others get flooding rains. This system will be one of the more powerful ones we have seen in recent years, and its impacts will not be as weak as some modeling systems have previously been predicting them to be.

Guidance does agree that there will be potentially significant icing involved with this storm. The GEM model above shows freezing rain accumulations for this storm in millimeters, and if you look closely at the pink dot on the right, it shows up as 100 millimeters of freezing rain. That is equivalent to just a few hairs under 4.00" of freezing rain. Now, I don't think this will be a 4.00" freezing rain event. The system is powerful enough, however, to produce a significant ice storm. We won't know specific accumulations for the freezing rain portion of the storm, but I would hazard a guess that over 1.00" of freezing rain is definitely within the realm of possibility.

Here's my last thought: I believe a southward shift is in the picture for this storm yet again. Why? Taking a look at model bias' yet again, as I have throughout this system, it was determined by the NCEP that energy in the Gulf of Alaska moves too slow across all models. Additionally, models have issues in not moving Arctic air and Arctic cold fronts south quickly enough to the east of the Rockies. Considering these two model bias', I do think there is wiggle room for another shift southward, and would not be surprised to see such a shift unfold. If we did see the energy in the Gulf of Alaska move faster than it is projected to (considered at this time to be a possibility), the system could very well return to what the ECMWF had previously been showing in terms of track, and possibly heavy snow as well. I'm not completely confident in these ensembles, so the chance of this happening is consequentially in question.

I would watch out for a southward model correction in future runs, in the event that we see the energy along the Canadian coast actually move faster than it is projected to. At the same time, however, the longer this new model consensus goes on for, the better chance it has of working out.

I'm not confident enough to release a second outlook, but here's a summary of my thoughts.
-We are looking at a significant storm system hitting a large part of the nation.
-A significant snow, ice and rain event is possible/probable with this storm system.
-There is potential for models to correct southward once again, though the degree of correction and probability of said correction is unknown at this time.

Andrew

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

When doe the next model run for snow come out? Please post it on Facebook if you have time.

Andrew said...

It comes out this evening, I will try to put it out there.

Shawn said...

I really truly hope it does move south again because I was really looking forward to the very heavy snow event! Andrew do you think this storm will have instability in the cold sector of this storm so that perhaps people could receive thundersnow? Possibly in different intensities? Back in 2007 in the early part of December it thundersnowed from like 12 or 1am to about 5am one morning and we ended up with I believe 18 inches of snow! If the canadian energy and artic air moves down faster than models are projecting, Could the snow occur possibly for several days instead of just Saturday night through Sunday? Could the storm become a blizzard on the snow side of the storm? And do you think this storm is going to be epic? :) And lastly, could this storm be given the G name from The Weather Channel?

Anonymous said...

the milwaukee discussion is interesting.
"EVERY RUN AS WE GET CLOSER IS INTENSIFYING THE SURFACE SYSTEM
MORE AND MORE. LOOKING AT SOME 30 YEAR ANOMALY PRODUCTS...THE
UPPER LEVEL JET CONTINUES TO SHOW AN INTENSITY THAT IS
STATISTICALLY ONLY SEEN ABOUT ONCE EVERY 30 YEARS OR SO. THE
QUESTION WILL BE HOW FAST THE LOWER LEVELS CAN RESPOND TO THAT
UPPER LEVEL ENERGY. THE LOW WILL BE INTENSIFYING AS IT MOVES INTO
THE AREA...WHICH MAKES THIS SYSTEM EVEN MORE
UNPREDICTABLE/DANGEROUS. THE FRONTOGENESIS IS...AS
EXPECTED...VERY STRONG AND VERY DEEPLY STACKED."

matt zuro said...

Aw man :/ Hope it shifts south :[

Ian said...

Thanks again for taking time out of your day to write these! I check back every day. Local weather stations do not go this in-depth.
Ian

Anonymous said...

Please, for the love of pete tell me this storm is not going to miss the Colorado mountains, I don't care much about Denver, since I live in town of Steamboat Springs, which is in the High Country to the northwest of Denver, I would love to know that we at least have a shot at getting in on this storm.

Jimmy Story said...

Andrew, what is your take on this storm for Connecticut /Massachusetts? We have about 10 inches of snow on the ground from the past two storms. Rumor has it that we'll be in the warm sector with heavy rain causing melting and flooding. Your turn my friend?

Anonymous said...

I'm interested in what was posted by Anonymous @ 4:46...I believe it!
this weather is crazy at best it seems for the last couple years!

Thank you Andrew for keeping us posted like you do, no other site nor TV station seems to know what is what or when it is coming it seems!
You are always on it way before anyone!
bree

Anonymous said...

Andrew,
Thank you for always being spot on. I always go you to first, and giggle when the local weather seem to play catch up when you've already
had the correct forcast out.

Anonymous said...

To the couple of posters that want this storm to go more south again...oh..I so prey that it does to!!!
I hate this stuff!!

bree

Jimmy Story said...

Andrew, just wondering what your take on the storm here in New England? Will it flood?